Michael de Adder’s choice of
a Rubik’s Cube as a metaphor for the process to change representation in the
Legislative Assembly is a very appropriate metaphor. In the effort to get a
single colour on one side, the other sides become a jumble. Since the goal of
the puzzle is to get all six sides in harmony, the solution can be frustrating
and elusive.
The Rubik’s Cube of
determining effective and appropriate riding boundaries is also elusive and
frustrating. Not only must the Commissioners determine ridings of equal
numerical value to respect the principle of “one person, one vote”, they also
need to consider the other factors that go into effective riding design:
reflecting communities of interest, the internal ties, respecting municipal and
administrative boundaries, ensuring the effective representation of rural areas
and so on.
Getting one side of this
cube right, achieving the numerical equality of the ridings, does not resolve
the whole puzzle. In fact, it often leaves the other sides of the cube a
complete jumble. But, rather than abandoning this puzzle as “impossible” a
fresh approach may be the solution.
Currently, representation in
the Capital Area is fairly straight-forward. The City of Fredericton is represented by four ridings.
The riding of Oromocto is largely urban and York, York North and Grand Lake
Gagetown are rural. New Maryland
– Sunbury West is a hybrid urban-rural riding.
On the other hand, the
Preliminary Report Proposal relies heavily on “hybrid” urban-rural ridings.
Instead of four ridings, the City of Fredericton
is now represented by only two ridings that are exclusively urban. The rest of
the City of Fredericton is split into
urban-rural ridings (Nashwaaksis-Stanley and Hanwell-Silverwood) or are
included in existing ridings (New Maryland – Sunbury West, Oromocto-Lincoln,
and Grand Lake )
outside of Fredericton .
Aside from the fact that
this proposal effectively diminishes the voice of residents of the City of Fredericton in the
Legislative Assembly, it also has a negative impact on the nearby rural areas,
which currently have their own representation in the Legislature.
It has been a
long-established principle that the best riding boundaries are those that
reflect common communities of interest, provide for effective representation of
these interests, and avoid, as much as is reasonably possible, creating
minority communities within ridings that could become disenfranchised in
relation to the majority.
To provide advice to the
Commissioners in accordance with their legislated mandate, the NB Riding
Boundaries Project Team has created a solution that addresses the need to
provide effective representation of local interests while abiding by the
numerical equality of voters in each riding.
As you will see from the
attached map, we propose that the City of Fredericton ,
along with the Village
of New Maryland , be
represented by four ridings in a Legislative Assembly of 49 members. Further,
we retain the rural ridings of York , York North
and Grand Lake and create a new urban-rural riding
of Oromocto-Lincoln.
In our view, this proposal
respects the need for effective representation of both urban and rural voters
from the Capital Area in the Legislative Assembly. The Village
of New Maryland has a strong
connection with the City of Fredericton , just as
the Village of Lincoln
shares strong ties with the Town of Oromocto
and adjacent LSDs.
And, to be sure that all six
sides of this Rubik Cube policy are the right colours, this proposal exists
within an overall proposal of 49 ridings – each numerically equal and
representative – that was presented to the Commission last week.
This is not a perfect
solution, but it is a good solution, to the difficult situation outlined in the
Commission’s Preliminary Report.
Proposed
Capital Area Ridings
(Voter
Counts, Variance from Electoral Quotient)
|
||||
#
|
Proposed Riding Name
|
# of Voters
|
Variance from EQ
|
Variance
|
36
|
Oromocto – Lincoln
|
11,744
|
104.2%
|
+475
|
37
|
|
11,406
|
101.2%
|
+137
|
38
|
|
11,368
|
100.9%
|
+99
|
39
|
|
11,065
|
98.2%
|
-204
|
40
|
|
11,467
|
101.8%
|
+198
|
41
|
|
11,439
|
101.5%
|
+170
|
42
|
|
11,728
|
104.1%
|
+459
|
43
|
|
11,172
|
99.1%
|
-97
|
If you would like to make comments on this proposal,
or to view the province-wide riding map that we propose, please visit Total
Quality Politics at http://rookwilcorner.blogspot.ca/
- 30 -
Chris Baker is President of Continuum Research, a
Fredericton-based public opinion research firm specializing in Public Policy,
Public Affairs and Strategic Planning. The work of William Blanchette, Bob
Doiron and Brian McCain, colleagues on the NB Riding Boundaries Project Team,
contributed to this article.
This article was originally published in the March
19, 2013 edition of The Daily Gleaner.
No comments:
Post a Comment